[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Millnert
millnert at gmail.com
Sat Feb 21 01:21:18 CET 2015
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 23:44 +0000, Leo Vegoda wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Martin Millnert wrote: > > [...] > > > > This means that new entrants will have a method to at least receive > > > a /22 from the RIPE NCC for the foreseeable future. > > > > At the current burn-rate, 8 years. > > Does you calculation anticipate the scheduled allocations that will be made to > the RIPE NCC under the Global Policy for Post Exhaustion IPv4 Allocation > Mechanisms by the IANA? It looks like March's allocation will deliver an extra > 512 /22s. No, simple stupid two point average line based on the numbers Elvis mentioned. But there's been additions during that time, too, I noticed in some graph. I bet Geoff can predict it better, modulo policy and behavioural changes. /M
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 New Policy Proposal (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]