[address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Last Call for Comments (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Last Call for Comments (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Last Call for Comments (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Feb 12 15:29:07 CET 2015
Hi, Apologies, I seem to have slightly messed up my mail indexing, and overlooked a comment from Nick Hilliard. On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 03:20:13PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > the review phase for 2014-12 has ended. [..] Questions / Discussion items: Nick Hilliard, request to clarify the wording on the minimum block size requirements for IPv6 PI at that time, and a question about the 24-month cooling period Given the otherwise positive comments, I would suggest the following. Erik: could you please answer Nick's question about the cooling period, and take his suggestion for the wording into account for the upcoming unified transfer document? Nick: after Erik has answered, can you please let us know if that is good enough for you to go ahead? Apologies again, did not pay enough attention there. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150212/cd24e5c7/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Last Call for Comments (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Last Call for Comments (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]