[address-policy-wg] Help Re: address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 17

‏في الثلاثاء، ١٨ أغسطس، ٢٠١٥, <address-policy-wg-request at ripe.net> كتب:

> Send address-policy-wg mailing list submissions to
>         address-policy-wg at ripe.net <javascript:;>
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         address-policy-wg-request at ripe.net <javascript:;>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         address-policy-wg-owner at ripe.net <javascript:;>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: 2015-04 New Policy Proposal (RIPE Resource Transfer
>       Policies) (Jan Ingvoldstad)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:26:30 +0200
> From: Jan Ingvoldstad <frettled at gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> To: Address Policy Working Group <address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> <javascript:;>>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Policy Proposal (RIPE
>         Resource Transfer Policies)
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAEffzkzzpKA1aqUtUzESDJpLggLbOUdfMhaETmStDcRddPmUjg at mail.gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:17 PM, James Blessing <
> james.blessing at despres.co.uk <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > On 14 August 2015 at 10:54, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > >     https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-04
> >
>
> Thanks for putting in the time and effort, Erik!
>
> Couple of questions/comments...
> >
> > From 1.0
> >
> > Shouldn't the scope be explicit as to what is/isn't included
> >
>
> I agree that this would help.
>
> >From 2.1
> >
> > "Transfers can be on a permanent or non-permanent basis."
> >
> > How is this going to be recorded and managed within the context of
> > reflecting it being a non-permanent transfer?
> >
>
> Wouldn't that be up to the RIPE NCC?
>
> >From 2.2
> >
> > "assigned by the RIPE NCC on a restricted basis (such as IPv4 or 16-bit
> > ASNs)"
> >
> > Rather than "such as" this needs to be a definitive list of what is
> > classed as a restricted resource
> >
>
> I concur, but I don't think it should be listed in the same document.
>
> My first thought is that this list should be maintained by the RIPE NCC.
>
> Keeping that list in a separate document means changing fewer documents
> when policy changes, or reality reaches a pre-set limit set in policy.
>
> That separate list should reference the policy documents enabling the
> restrictions.
>
> >From 3.1
> >
> > Again a list of conditions or references to policies that impose
> > restrictions needed
> >
>
> I'm a bit confused both by the point and by your response to it, maybe I'm
> just tired, but I think both could be clearer. :)
>
> >From 4.0
> >
> > M&A process is mentioned, should there be other references to this?
> > Especially as M&A (as I understand it) allows 2.2 to be overridden
> >
>
> "The document proposes to include the transfer restrictions to mergers and
> acquisitions. This is done to make the policy more in line with the
> intention of the transfer policy restrictions when proposed."
>
> General
> >
> > - As this is about transfers should this also cover returning
> > resources to ripe NCC so all types of transfers be included
> >
>
> I'm not sure that this would be useful, but 2015-04 could 1) include a
> reference to the policy for that, and 2) make it even clearer that this is
> a document for transfers between resource holders.
>
> I don't think it's useful to consider the RIR a resource holder in this
> context.
>
> - broadly support the unification of transfer policy into a single
> > document, just things bits are missing or muddy
> >
>
> Agreed, but the document is largely clarifying more than muddying, IMHO.
> --
> Jan
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150817/cf35e13e/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> End of address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 48, Issue 17
> *************************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150819/1421be46/attachment.html>