[address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Sat Aug 15 12:33:08 CEST 2015
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015, at 09:57, ripe at europeiptv.net wrote: > Hello, The proposal is that once an LIR has received one /22 from > 185/8, LIRs are eligible to apply for another /22, and that the blocks > ranges are used that IANA has redistributed so far today is: > > 45.128.0.0 - 45.159.255.255 > 45.8.0.0 - 45.15.255.255 > 45.80.0.0 - 45.95.255.255 > > and that these allocations are governed by the policy 2015-01 as well. > > You know what I mean? ( I'm sorry for my English ). Hi, You are not the not the only one thinking about the "last /8 policy" revision. See https://ripe70.ripe.net/presentations/93-Last-_8-allocation-size.pdf However, there are 2 conflicting point on which a number of community members insist (on both at the same time): - making the "last /8" pool (including recovered space) last as long as possible - no not reinstate needs-based policy Whatever touches the allocation policy would violate at least one of them.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]