[address-policy-wg] New Proposal for IPv4 Allocations

Hello Carsten,

What I think David is trying to say is to make LIRs elegible for another 
/22 out from the 185/8.

And He gives as example the recieved blocks from IANA:
45.128.0.0  -  45.159.255.255
45.8.0.0  -  45.15.255.255
45.80.0.0  -  45.95.255.255

This is a good example of a discussion that can happens out of the list 
and if a proposal comes then here is the place to discuss it.

Now will happen a lot of -1 or +1 in the mail list for something that is 
NOT a proposal.

PS: David, what you are trying to say have been discussed here and the 
answer is no.

Regards,

--Daniel

El 14/08/2015 a las 14:47, Carsten Schiefner escribió:
> Dear David,
>
> On 14.08.2015 09:09, ripe at europeiptv.net wrote:
>> Hello, I wonder what you think the community ripe to propose a new
>> policy for IPv4 addressing, the proposal would be something like having
>> another RIR as APNIC.
>>
>>
>> We all know that RIPE currently has in place the policy for the last /8,
>> the proposal is correct but, because it does not make eligible LIRs for
>> another /22?
>>
>> The new /22 It would address that IANA has redistributed to RIPE.
>>
>> 45.128.0.0  -  45.159.255.255
>> 45.8.0.0  -  45.15.255.255
>> 45.80.0.0  -  45.95.255.255
>>
>> and 2015-01 policy active, no transfer for next 24 months after
>> allocation, and it is found necessary to use this new allocation, so it
>> would prevent requested to speculate.
>>
>> I hope your views regarding this
>
> even after having re-read this a couple of times I have not the
> slightest clue what you are aiming at.
>
> I am sorry.
>
> Best,
>
> 	-C.
>