[address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Policy Proposal (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Policy Proposal (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Policy Proposal (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Blessing
james.blessing at despres.co.uk
Fri Aug 14 12:17:25 CEST 2015
On 14 August 2015 at 10:54, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-04 > > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 14 September. Couple of questions/comments... >From 1.0 Shouldn't the scope be explicit as to what is/isn't included >From 2.1 "Transfers can be on a permanent or non-permanent basis." How is this going to be recorded and managed within the context of reflecting it being a non-permanent transfer? >From 2.2 "assigned by the RIPE NCC on a restricted basis (such as IPv4 or 16-bit ASNs)" Rather than "such as" this needs to be a definitive list of what is classed as a restricted resource >From 3.1 Again a list of conditions or references to policies that impose restrictions needed >From 4.0 M&A process is mentioned, should there be other references to this? Especially as M&A (as I understand it) allows 2.2 to be overridden General - As this is about transfers should this also cover returning resources to ripe NCC so all types of transfers be included - broadly support the unification of transfer policy into a single document, just things bits are missing or muddy J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Policy Proposal (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Policy Proposal (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]