[address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue Aug 11 14:03:04 CEST 2015
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, David Huberman wrote: > If at some point in the future, the NCC or community discovers some > child has abused the system and taken an absurd number of ASNs, the NCC > has the power to revoke the ASNs under sections 6.3, 9.3, and 9.4 of the > RIPE NCC Standard Service Agreement. I just read 6.3, 9.3 and 9.4. I don't see which of these I would be in violation of if I went to RIPE NCC and asked for 10k ASNs "because I need them" under the proposed new policy of just recording reason. With the proposed policy of just recording reason given, I don't see how the resources can be revoked (because I have given reason and those reasons have been registered by RIPE NCC), at least not referring to 6.3, 9.3 and 9.4. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]