[address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Aug 11 13:26:28 CEST 2015
> - if an end user wants a single ASN32 and they don't already have one, they > should get it on the basis of entitlement. > > - if an end user wants more than one ASN32, they should get it on the basis > of a needs-based policy. > > - if an end user wants one or more ASN16s, they should get it on the basis > of an needs-based policy, unless the remaining pool of ASN16s has reached a > certain threshold > > - regardless of the requirement, end users may only receive one ASN16 from > the remaining pool, and this should be assigned on the basis of a > needs-based policy. those last two do not correlate and, does end user include lir? randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]