[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 "Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Numbers Assignments" take #4

* Job Snijders <job at instituut.net> [2015-08-11 11:18]:
> 
> I've noted as an argument opposing this proposal: "An adversary could
> try to deplete the pool of available ASNs." If someone has a workable
> suggestion how to resolve that in policy, I am all ears, but I wouldn't
> mind a pragmatic approach where we just trust our community and deal
> with issues if and when they arise.

As we all have seen how well "our community" works for IPv4 from the
last-/8 I would not like to see something like that happen again.

We could use rough consensus to decide if someone gets a new AS
number. (I'm only 85% joking).

Regards

Sebastian

-- 
GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE.
            -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 581 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150811/9ca77500/attachment.sig>