This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Tue Apr 28 14:58:37 CEST 2015
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:00:40PM +0200, Marco Schmidt wrote: >The proposal aims to expand the criteria for evaluating initial >IPv6 allocations larger than a /29. The RIPE NCC would consider >additional aspects beyond only the number of existing users and >extent of the organisation's infrastructure. 1) I've some issues with the language of the proposal, namely the idea of "mitigating wastefulness" by prescribing or proscribing certain concepts and practices either by the NCC or the community. I believe that everyone runs their own network at the end of the day and neither the NCC, the membership nor the apwg community are qualified to judge individual members' network design decisions. 2) There is some issue with transparency if the text is removed as proposed insofar as there is, then, no guidance whatsoever on how an alloc request >/29 is judged. Perhaps this can be addressed in the NCC Impact Statement. 3) I'm inclined to support this proposal, however, if these issues are addressed. rgds, Sascha Luck rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]