This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Tue Apr 28 13:00:57 CEST 2015
On 2015-04-28 11:30, Christian Kratzer wrote: [...] > Even if you insist that you want to see the prefix in the global routing table "We" may *want* to see it in the global routing table, but like with all the other prefixes, there's no good reasoning for that expectation. TCP/IP is a technology and that technology is *not* exclusively used for the global Internet. We had that "wish" and discussion in the past (e.g. in the AS# application and PI-"need".) It never worked, neither technically nor admin-wise. That's a non-starter... Wilfried. > and want pingable targets brokers will full any of those requirements with ease. > > There is propably no way to stop hoarding without also hurting legitimate business. > > Greetings > Christian >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]