This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Tue Apr 28 12:14:40 CEST 2015
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:05:57AM +0100, Carlos Friacas wrote: Hi > What i don't like is the ability for someone to create a new LIR knowing it > will be decommissioned later, because the only intent is to "catch" a /22. And this is nothing new. Some time ago, during the AP-WG meeting in Tallinn, ICANN representative suggested the same for me. The only intent behind that was to "catch" another v6 /32. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]