This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-TOM-
tom at kebab.org.pl
Thu Apr 23 18:16:42 CEST 2015
W dniu 2015-04-23 o 17:16, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) pisze: > > Why Elvis, a well know IP Broker from V4Escrow, proposed this instead > of "Unused space should be returned to RIPE"??? > Yessss!!! There are tons of unused /16's and even RIPE after ERX and LEGACY actions has currently no contact or confirmations to many of their holders. Thus the database is still full of garbage leaving people who need IPv4 to be potential fraud victim. Moreover, I think that the depletion of IPv4 space in RIPE region may not be real. IMO all the legacy space, that has not been confirmed in use (for example no contact with legitimate holder, no route objects within it) in next .... 6-12(?) months should be implicitly returned to the free pool. > Did the community think about if all the offers in the Listing Service > are reclaimed from RIPE, the IPv4 Exhaustion "dissapear"? > > Why nobody in the community proposed it? > Let's make the proposal. Best regards Tomasz Śląski
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]