This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Opteamax GmbH
ripe at opteamax.de
Thu Apr 23 17:39:06 CEST 2015
On 23.04.2015 17:20, -TOM- wrote: > > Over described situation is not significantly different from real user > assignment. How to distinguish them? Send auditors? > So if I get you right only because it is impossible to check, it is ok to cheat? And only because others do it, it's ok to do it? So porting this arguement into "real-live" would come to the conclusion: "it's fully ok to remove your license-plate, wear some mask over your face, fill your car at the gas-station and drive away without paying, because it can not be validated who it was?" So even that it is possible, it is still IMHO not ok ... wondering if it's today understood as acceptable and ok to cheat and find as many backdoors as possible to have a personal advantage, no matter that the rules and policy says differently, only because it's hard to validate ... BR Jens
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]