[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Thu Apr 23 17:04:54 CEST 2015
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015, at 16:37, Opteamax GmbH wrote: > Don't get me wrong, I don't want to soften the "last /8" policy ... as > Alex already mentioned. A business which needs IPv4 to survive does > something wrong ... Today, 23/04/2015, a business *DOES* need IPv4 to survive. IPv6 is still seen as a "geek thing", and a lot of things are still badly implemented (if implemented at all) over IPv6. The policy, the way it is, just keps the agony going on for a very long time, at least in RIPE-land.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]