[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

> Because the policy says "one /22 per LIR".

Policy sets this rule only for /22's received from RIPE NCC.

Indeed, RIPE NCC will not allocate you several /22. I have tested it :)

The only way is to receive allocations from other LIR (own or belonging to other companies). An such order doesn't abuse any policies.

If we suppose having multiple /22 per LIR is abusing then main "abuser" is RIPE NCC since RIPE NCC makes transfers and LIR merging allowing to receive second /22 etc.

23.04.2015, 16:35, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net>:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:22:51PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
>>  What from this quotation is? Please give me a link.
>>  And what statement exactly of the current policy is abusing?
>
> Stop turning in circles.  This question has been answered before.
>>  Also I would like to receive concrete answer to the question:
>>  Why using multiple /22's for own company is not abusing but selling is abusing?
>
> Because the policy says "one /22 per LIR".
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

-- 
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503