[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vladimir Andreev
vladimir at quick-soft.net
Thu Apr 23 14:41:10 CEST 2015
You say "legitimate" business processes. But how have decided what is "legitimate" and what is not? I see no prohibition in current policies to open, receive /22 and close. So it's also "legitimate" business! And why receiving /22's for own company is "legitimate" and for selling is not? 23.04.2015, 15:38, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net>: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:22:34PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote: >> But the proposal doesn't forbid to open many LIRs and then merge them together. > > Indeed, because that would prevent legitimate business processes. > > But what it does is making the "open, sell, close" quick cycle > less economically interesting. Which is all we can do here. > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]