[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Apr 23 14:20:19 CEST 2015
Hi, On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:07:54PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote: > In my opinion any change to policy should reflect expectation of community as a whole. "Rough consensus" does not mean *everybody* has to agree. > Current propose doesn't change anything to the direction of improvement for community. Oh, to the contrary - ensuring that allocations from the last /8 are not burnt like crazy (by permitting arbitrary fast trading) might not be something good for you personally, but for the *rest* of the community, it might be actually a good thing (depending on whether or not you believe in the rationale for the last /8 policy). The last /8 is not there to do "business as usual, based on IPv4" - it is there to enable *new* market entrants to run a few critical things with IPv4, while the main deployment has to happen on IPv6. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150423/20f06bcd/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]