[address-policy-wg] WG Chair Collective (Re: WG chair re-selection procedure)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG Chair Collective (Re: WG chair re-selection procedure)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Tue Sep 16 14:44:43 CEST 2014
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > > In my view the thing now is to look forwards rather than backwards. The > outcome of those earlier discussions addresses the basic problem. There > will soon be clear and transparent mechanisms for each WG to select its > Chairs. I doubt it matters much how we got to that destination or why it > took so long. The point is we're there. At last! > Looking forward, it seems obvious to me that some work should be done to ensure a reasonable standardization of these mechanisms, so that e.g. if I were to take part in another WG, I'd instantly know how these procedures worked. It's difficult enough to be a fresh WG participant without having to expend extra time on reading and understanding different procedures. And I suppose this is your fear, that having too detailed procedures could be demotivating to WG participants. It would be less potentially demotivating with a concise, common procedure set. I'm not saying that it is demotivating, and I still think that the general idea of how to handle governance is sufficiently sound to proceed with. -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140916/7e9faedd/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG Chair Collective (Re: WG chair re-selection procedure)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]