[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Nov 24 03:37:25 CET 2014
> Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote: >> Easy. The current IPv6 deploy makes me cry like a little girl. NOBODY >> (as percentage) is deploying it in their customer/backone/whatever >> network. > ... even if stated again and again, it simply is not true. Please stop > these claims, they may be even more detrimental to IPv6 deployment, if > read by some people not having "real data" and/or first-hand > experience. perhaps a pointer to these real data would make your point randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]