[address-policy-wg] Just FYI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shahab Vahabzadeh
sh.vahabzadeh at gmail.com
Sat Nov 22 11:08:27 CET 2014
Hi there, Yes I know, But they only peer with the ASN which you bought service from. You mean ISPs must buy two kind of service from provider (this upstream) to be multi-home or convince the peer with both of ASNs? Thanks On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Reza Mahmoudi <R.mahmoudi at mobinnet.net> wrote: > Hi > > > > To add a comment, the upstream you mentioned here, has at least 2 > different ASN's. In addition, Multihome doesn't necessarily mean peering > with the sole upstream but you can peer with others... > > > > Cheers, > > Reza > > > > *From:* address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto: > address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] *On Behalf Of *Shahab Vahabzadeh > *Sent:* Saturday, November 22, 2014 1:22 PM > *To:* Saeed Khademi > *Cc:* address-policy-wg at ripe.net > *Subject:* Re: [address-policy-wg] Just FYI > > > > Dear Saeed, > > Thanks for this, But is there any to control this? In country like Iran in > which you can only peer with your upstream. > > What they can do? > > Thanks > > > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Saeed Khademi <saeed at ipm.ir> wrote: > > Dear members, > > > > During previous RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, I noticed that ( according to > our instructor ) there are some organizations > > having AS number while they do not have a multihome network. > > > > According policy it is a mandatory requirement for having an ASN. Even in > AS request form there is a mandatory field ( peers ) > > which requestor has to declare at least 2 peers, otherwise the request > will not be processed by hostmaster. > > and here: > > > http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/allocations-and-assignments/request-an-as-number > > it is clearly mentioned that "Current guidelines require a network to be > multi-homed, and have a unique routing policy for an ASN to be assigned" > > > > Now if it is really true that there are single-home organizations with > ASN, isn't it a wrong doing? > > > > Kind Regards, > > Saeed. > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator > > Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871 0742 > PGP Key Fingerprint = 1C43 988E 01A8 4D95 B662 9118 CD94 9F10 4DF4 6163 > > > > -- > > This email was Virus checked by Juniper Security Gateway. > > -- Regards, Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871 0742 PGP Key Fingerprint = 1C43 988E 01A8 4D95 B662 9118 CD94 9F10 4DF4 6163 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20141122/c3e680eb/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]