[address-policy-wg] Just FYI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-10 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in “IPv6 Addresses for Internet Root Servers In The RIPE Region”)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Saeed Khademi
saeed at ipm.ir
Sat Nov 22 10:19:22 CET 2014
Dear members, During previous RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, I noticed that ( according to our instructor ) there are some organizations having AS number while they do not have a multihome network. According policy it is a mandatory requirement for having an ASN. Even in AS request form there is a mandatory field ( peers ) which requestor has to declare at least 2 peers, otherwise the request will not be processed by hostmaster. and here: http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/allocations-and-assignments/request-an-as-number it is clearly mentioned that “Current guidelines require a network to be multi-homed, and have a unique routing policy for an ASN to be assigned” Now if it is really true that there are single-home organizations with ASN, isn’t it a wrong doing? Kind Regards, Saeed. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20141122/9dff0439/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-10 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in “IPv6 Addresses for Internet Root Servers In The RIPE Region”)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]