[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10

On 09.11.14, 17.06, Lu wrote:
> Should we put address policy wh together with IPv6 wg? Why we need two different wg for addressing?the day we start treat IPv6 as normal IP address is the day we really in a world of v6.
You may want to have a look at the charter for the two working-groups,
they were as I remember carefully crafted some years back - to make sure
there is no overlap.

As Address-policy is normally two time-slots and Ipv6 1-2 timeslots a
combined working-group would be pretty large.

One reason to treat Ipv6 different than Ip4 is that the RIPE community
still need to focus on promoting an d deployment of Ipv6 . a challenge
we do not have with Ipv4:-)

But this is of-course up to the Workinggroups...


http://www.ripe.net/ripe/groups/wg/ipv6

    IPv6 is the next generation Internet Protocol. The IPv6 working
    group exists to promote IPv6 adoption.

    The working group activities may be anything useful in helping
    people to deploy IPv6, and to manage IPv4/IPv6 co-existence. These
    activities include:

      * Outreach
      * Education
      * Sharing deployment experiences
      * Discussing and fixing operational issues

    The working group will cooperate with operators and others, both
    inside and outside the networking industry, to share resources and
    combine efforts.

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/groups/wg/ap

    The Address Policy Working Group develops policies relating to the
    management and registration of Internet addresses and routing
    identifiers (currently IPv4, IPv6 and ASN) by the RIPE NCC and the
    LIRs within the RIPE NCC Service Region.

    Anyone with an interest in Internet numbering issues is welcome to
    observe participate and contribute to the working group.

-- 
Hans Petter Holen
Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph at oslo.net | http://hph.oslo.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20141113/a37d9245/attachment.html>