[address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mailing List Account
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Thu May 15 12:08:14 CEST 2014
All, On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:05:08AM +0200, Marco Schmidt wrote: >You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-01 >And the draft document at: > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-01/draft Yes, I think I can sign up to this. Maybe, it is also a step towards removing the PI/PA separation. One question though, if the minimum (sub-)/allocation size is now /24, is the part regarding classless reverse delegation in the impact statement now obsolete? rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]