[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Thu May 8 00:00:04 CEST 2014
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:57:25PM -0500, Lu Heng wrote: >> I personally believe we might no longer need to distinguish PI and >> PA--it might solve all the question all together. > > We tried to go there, the WG rejected the proposal... and I can > understand that, as the complications in the actual implementations > are significant. Hmm as I remember there was no rejection of the idea, more a cancellation of the started work due to the implication and complication involved in getting done. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]