[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 New Policy Proposal (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 New Policy Proposal (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 New Policy Proposal (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Thu May 1 18:17:47 CEST 2014
On 01/05/2014 11:10, Saku Ytti wrote: > a) should 16b ASN be special? You get GLOP/24 with it and you get BGP > communities. Some use-cases absolutely depend on these, some use-cases don't. > Is it realistic/possible to have different requirements for 16b and 32b? running an ASN32 leaf network is fine, otherwise it's a bit tragic due to community pain. Would probably not be a bad idea to differentiate between asn16 and asn32 until we see a functional bgp community spec widely available which is fully asn32 compatible. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 New Policy Proposal (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 New Policy Proposal (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]