[address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Sat Mar 29 20:17:52 CET 2014
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 05:44:21PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: >The proposal at hand is not affecting "last /8" policy, and as such, >has no influence on routability of allocations handed out by the RIPE NCC. Yep, Janos already pointed out that I missed the bit where 2014-01 doesn't change the "last /8" allocation size. D-oh. >> Another good question is whether under final-/8 rules, if you can only >> justify, say a /29, this will be the last request considered? >Justification of a single IP address will give you your last-/8-/22, if >you had none before. There is no granularity in last-/8 allocations, it's >"a single piece of standard-size fits all". yep, as above. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]