[address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Thu Mar 27 08:34:36 CET 2014
On 27.03.2014 07:52, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > Whether sub-allocations can be made from *all* these (new) allocations > or "just" from those being at least a /24 appears as a separate question > to me. Even more so, as the the sub-allocation mechanism has been > applied or used very rarely only so far. "... according to figures I have received from the RIPE NCC wrt. this." I should have added here. Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]