[address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Velea
elvis at velea.eu
Tue Mar 25 18:35:27 CET 2014
Hi Gert, On 25/03/14 15:26, Gert Doering wrote: [...] > There might be other reasons as well.. It's just a feeling that limiting > at /24 is the right thing to do. On the other hand, while writing this > e-mail I've been having second thoughts on each of the paragraphs and > reasons :-) > It's good to have the arguments out, so we can think through them - thanks! I tried to play the devil's advocate role this time. As said, even when writing all my con's I realized these aren't too strong. As you already know, I'm in favor of not adding any limitations in policy. I was just trying to voice all the possible con's. > > Gert Doering > -- no hats cheers, elvis -- blue hat to protect against the sun :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]