[address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hannigan, Martin
marty at akamai.com
Mon Mar 24 19:33:46 CET 2014
On Mar 24, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:24:31AM -0700, Scott Leibrand wrote: >> Would this proposal allow end users to request the transfer of a single >> IPv4 /32? > > Technically, yes, if a) we permit PI transfers (proposal in the works), > and b) the RIPE NCC has given out a /32 PI. > > End users reciving PA space have no transfer rights whatsoever, that space > can only transfered by the PA holder (= the LIR). > I'm generally in support of this proposal as-is, at this time. Best, -M<
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]