This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers - Clarifying the RIPE NCC Legal Position
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Crimea papers - Clarifying the RIPE NCC Legal Position
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 35, Issue 27
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sergey Myasoedov
sergey at devnull.ru
Tue Jul 29 12:37:47 CEST 2014
Very good point. Thanks for the explanation Athina! Tuesday, July 29, 2014, 12:02:04 PM, you wrote: AF> The RIPE NCC can neither recognise nor deny one state’s authority over a AF> region. Given the situation in Crimea, the RIPE NCC is striving to AF> facilitate the provision of its services to network operators in this AF> area and does not wish to deny services for political reasons. -- Sergey
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Crimea papers - Clarifying the RIPE NCC Legal Position
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 35, Issue 27
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]