[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2014-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Thu Jul 17 10:22:04 CEST 2014
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> wrote: > > In any case, the IA ends by mentioning the possibility of the NCC > preparing a procedural document that lists the various justifications > for ASNs that will be approved. I think this is a reasonable approach. > The list could start out with containing 1) multihoming, 2) anything > from RFC1930, and 3) any other example from 2014-03's supporting notes; > and be amended as required based on light-weight consultation with the > community/wg (as opposed to requiring full PDP cycles every time). > > Nice. Also, this would certainly make it easier for those who wonder what they should put in their request. -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140717/5f179d9b/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2014-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]