[address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool

W dniu 2014-07-03 00:22, Elvis Daniel Velea pisze:

> I would say that it is only dangerous if you have never done business
> before. You should never pay in advance for something that you have not
> yet received. Various types of Escrow agreements or Bank Guarantee
> Letters are used, usually, when an IPv4 allocation is transferred. These
> are processes that do not involve the RIPE NCC but which make the
> transfers happen. Brokers are happy to assist with these processes.

What do you say about situation: you bought, the transfers are made 
successfully​​, you paid after transfers, and suddenly after 8-12 months 
after transaction you see deletion and revert on the objects, because 
RIPE says that they were sold by a cheater. RIPE is not trying to help, 
they only said, that is because a due diligence process. My question is, 
where was the due diligence *during* the approved transfer?

> Any new LIR will receive a /22 allocation as long as they can justify
> the use of at least one IP address. The policy is very simple in this
> regard.

Again - this is not obvious. What about a situation that you are paying 
for setting up a LIR and then you do not get allocation, even though you 
show its need? And in the dispute you get the answer:
"By signing the RIPE NCC Standard Service Agreement you only become a 
member. The membership fee covers the membership alone. Whether you 
receive an IP allocation is being separately reviewed."



Regards

Tomasz Slaski