[address-policy-wg] Announcing address resources
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Announcing address resources
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Announcing address resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Jan 6 20:52:12 CET 2014
> Hi John. > > I've recently been asked some questions about IPv6 allocations. So I > went back and reviewed the current ARIN NRPM. > > John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> writes: > > > Since we do have a service region, we require requesters to be operating in > > the ARINregion and to announce the least-specific in the region, but nothing > > precludes announcement of same or more specifics from outside the region. > > <https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_31/PDF/monday/nobile_policy.pdf> > > FWIW, I couldn't find any mention of announcements in the NRPM, other > than in the context of multihoming. So, where exactly does the above > requirement about announcements come from? > > Also, if one is required to announce the full prefix within ARIN, > doesn't that imply one can't get an allocation for private use where > there is no intention to announce publically? > > Finally, there does not seem to be much clarity in the term "operating > in the ARIN region". Consider a global entity that effectively > operates in multiple, if not all regions. Let's assume their primary > or legal home is within the ARIN region. Is that enough? Apparently > not entirely. I've been told that when providing justification for > obtaining IPv6 address space, ARIN only counts usage within the ARIN > region. That implies multi-nationals are expected to go to multiple > RIRs, and get fragmented address space, something I thought RIR > addressing policies were supposed to discourage. > > Do I understand ARIN policies correctly? > > And do other RIRs do the same? I.e., do the collective RIR policies > really say multi-nationals need to go to each RIR to get the address > space they need, rather than going to one, and getting a single > aggregate? > > Thomas thomas, you must be misunderstanding something. for many years, arin has said that they have nothing to do with routing. randy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 527 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140106/78429687/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Announcing address resources
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Announcing address resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]