[address-policy-wg] Post Ident / Post Brief

Hi all,

On 26.02.2014 12:40, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> I agree with the NCC in regards of "not trusting an LIR". Becoming an
> LIR is easy (money wise and procedure wise) and does not imply a high
> value of trust for the LIR.

But then we should preferably think about how to make LIRs more
trustable ... IMHO the hierarchy of internet-number-assignment is
intended to make the processes more handleable ... if the RIR does not
trust his LIRs, what is the RIR for? Then we'd only need one world-wide
registry (so probably ICANN) and they have to validate stuff... or we
think about trusting the LIR (and maybe even make a withdrawal of
resources extremely expensive for the LIR if he did not fullfill his
obligations) and make it easy and possible to fullfill all regional (in
this case countrywise) requirements all over the RIPE region.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand this as the reason for having
LOCAL internet registries!

BR
Jens
-- 
Opteamax GmbH - RIPE-Team
Jens Ott

Opteamax GmbH

Simrockstr. 4b
53619 Rheinbreitbach

Tel.:  +49 2224 969500
Fax:   +49 2224 97691059
Email: jo at opteamax.de

HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur
Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989