[address-policy-wg] Post Ident / Post Brief

Dear Sergey,

we were specifically debating the German PostIdent procedure - which is 
used by (almost?) all German direct/no branch offices/online banks. But 
AFAIK it is not restricted to German banks, non-German banks might be 
using it as well. As I am not sure about this  - I do not have a 
non-German bank as an example at hand - I have put "German" in "()".

Or shorter: security and trust lies with the process and provider of a 
service - and not with its users and/or customers.

Best,

	-C.

On 25.02.2014 23:16, Sergey Myasoedov wrote:
> I can’t agree.
>
> On 25 Feb 2014, at 23:07, Carsten Schiefner
> <ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de> wrote:
>
>> what Richard said: what is good enough for (German) banks to e.g.
>> open an account, should be sufficient for the NCC as well, me
>> thinks.
>
> in other words, what is good enough for
> transistrian/lebanese/BVI/iranian/somalian banks - should be good
> enough for the NCC? what data quality we are trying to achive?