[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and ImpactAnalysis Published (Removing IPv6 Requirement for ReceivingSpace from the Final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Removing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Removing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mike Burns
mike at iptrading.com
Wed Dec 10 16:13:18 CET 2014
Support. The marginal public awareness utility of the IPv6 requirement is not worth the policy verbiage. Well-intentioned but inappropriate use of policy to burden members with unwanted IPv6 space. It's like I want a piece of cake and mother says okay, but you must also take some more vegetables. The vegetables remain on the plate, uneaten and destined for the garbage, because mother thinks I might try them and like them. I would change my mother's policy if I could! -----Original Message----- From: Erik Bais Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:21 AM To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and ImpactAnalysis Published (Removing IPv6 Requirement for ReceivingSpace from the Final /8) Support +1
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Removing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Removing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]