[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal Implemented: 2014-02, "Allow PI transfer"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT)
d.baeza at tvt-datos.es
Mon Dec 1 13:16:27 CET 2014
El 01/12/2014 12:58, Gert Doering escribió: > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:25:58AM +0100, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote: >> For that reason, I dont support this proposal. >> >> We, as community, must try to foment IPv6 over everything. > > I agree that we need to see more IPv6 deployment. Thanks :D > As far as your opposition to the proposal goes, I consider it to be > heard and addressed (because the group considers the requirements in > the current policy to be insufficient to actually further IPv6 deployment, > and as such, sticking to it is not helping to reach that goal). Im ok with that. I was just pointing my reasons. > Since there is quite strong support otherwise, and we only need *rough* > consensus, we'll go forward with it anyway. Consensus does not have > to be unanimous. Agree. If there is consensus the proposal should go forward. :) -- Daniel Baeza
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal Implemented: 2014-02, "Allow PI transfer"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]