[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 two cents on multi homing ASN requirement
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014081101013263] Transfer from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 two cents on multi homing ASN requirement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aleksi Suhonen
ripe-ml-2012 at ssd.axu.tm
Thu Aug 14 05:02:20 CEST 2014
Hello, On 07/11/2014 11:21 AM, Marco Schmidt wrote: > The draft document for the proposal described in 2014-03, > "Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments" has been > published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal > has also been published. I know I'm late in the game, but I thought I'd contribute this view rather than stay silent: Remove multi homing requirement for 32bit ASNs only, keep the requirement for 16bit ASNs. I foresee new weird legacy setups run by non-ISPs that still require a unique ASN well into the future. The example I would usually use is factory floor environments, but that is probably not an applicable example here. I hope someone else's imagination can supply a valid example. Cheers, -- Aleksi Suhonen You say "potato", I say "closest-exit."
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014081101013263] Transfer from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 two cents on multi homing ASN requirement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]