[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014081101013263] Transfer from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014081101013263] Transfer from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014081101013263] Transfer from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LeaderTelecom Ltd.
info at leadertelecom.ru
Tue Aug 12 09:02:02 CEST 2014
Sergey, > I see. You mentioned 37 transfers in 2014, that equal to /17,/20,/22. > Is this number significant enough to develop the policy change? I think, yes. While amont of such transfers from last /8 will increase anyway. Sergey, what is your opinion? -- Aleksei 12.08.2014 03:23 - Sergey Myasoedov написал(а): > Yes. I afaraid that last /8 will be used for creating new LIRs only reselling IPv4-adresses. As a result last /8 will be run out very fast. I see. You mentioned 37 transfers in 2014, that equal to /17,/20,/22. Is this number significant enough to develop the policy change? -- Sergey On 11 Aug 2014, at 21:49, LeaderTelecom Ltd. <info at leadertelecom.ru> wrote: > Dear Sergey, > > > I am able to read the written text :) but I don’t see the reason for your proposal. > Ok. I thinked that I wrote not very clear. > > > Or maybe you would like to limit the practice when companies being created for requesting allocation only? > > Yes. I afaraid that last /8 will be used for creating new LIRs only reselling IPv4-adresses. As a result last /8 will be run out very fast. > > If the last /8 starts from digth "185" then we can see thansfers from companies: > 23.01.2013 "TOP NET" PJSC > 15.05.2013 CallWithMe > 01.07.2013 VERIXI SPRL > 04.07.2013 PJSC "Fars Telecommunication Company" > 09.07.2013 Aria Web Development LLC > 16.10.2013 Pars Fonoun Ofogh Information Technology and Communications Company LTD > 17.12.2013 Julian Alberto Gomez Hernandez trading as "Adjenet Networks" > 02.01.2014 Sara Rebollido Sueiro > 24.01.2014 NOV'IT SAS > 27.01.2014 Flex Networks Services B.V. > 27.01.2014 IPhouse B.V. > 27.01.2014 NLTM B.V. > 04.02.2014 Dark Group Ltd > 04.02.2014 Froehlich-Reisen GmbH > 05.02.2014 Julian Alberto Gomez Hernandez trading as "Adjenet Networks" > 13.02.2014 Julian Alberto Gomez Hernandez trading as "Adjenet Networks" > 13.02.2014 Julian Alberto Gomez Hernandez trading as "Adjenet Networks" > 13.02.2014 Skylogic Polska Sp. Z.o.o. > 28.02.2014 Netfactor Iletisim Hizmetleri Limited Sirketi > 13.03.2014 LLC Arksys > 21.03.2014 Xite Group BV > 25.03.2014 ANDRZEJ BACINSKI trading as PUMPS & SYSTEMS > 10.04.2014 LEVEL IP ITALIA S.R.L. > 29.04.2014 STIS Engineering co. LTD > 06.05.2014 Santrex Internet Services Ltd. > 08.05.2014 AnDilo AB > 13.05.2014 GLASHELDER BV > 15.05.2014 Reseau Stella SARL > 16.05.2014 Connect-it Telecom BV > 16.05.2014 Mobile Communications (MOCO) BV > 02.06.2014 A.M. Bayhan is trading as "DediColo Services" > 02.06.2014 DediColo B.V. > 04.06.2014 CLOUDGLOBAL FRANCE SAS > 06.06.2014 Optimal IT Development SRL > 20.06.2014 BIKS+ Ltd > 20.06.2014 CJSC ADVANTAGE TELECOM > 26.06.2014 International Communication company Persian Sheetsan Ltd. > 10.07.2014 TELECABLE LTD > 23.07.2014 "StoTelecom" Ltd. > 23.07.2014 Michiel Muhlenbaumer > 29.07.2014 EMY AUTO BEST SRL > 30.07.2014 Host Sailor Ltd. > 31.07.2014 Van Veen Beheer BV > 04.08.2014 WBS Consulting Czech Republic s.r.o. > > > -- > Aleksei > > 11.08.2014 21:58 - Sergey Myasoedov написал(а): > Aleksei, > I am able to read the written text :) but I don’t see the reason for your > proposal. > > Do you consider unfair single (at least in first 2 years) allocation transfer? > Why? > > Or maybe you would like to limit the practice when companies being created for > requesting allocation only? > > > -- > Sergey > > On 11 Aug 2014, at 18:09, LeaderTelecom Ltd. <info at leadertelecom.ru> wrote: > > > Sergey, > > > > > what is the point of your proposal? > > I propose don't allow transfers from last /8 during first 2 years afer date of allocation from RIPE NCC pool. > > > > Example: some LIR get IPv4 from last /8 at 11.08.2014. In period 11.08.2014 - 10.08.2016 transfer of it's IPs are not allowed. Since 11.08.2016 this LIR can transfer IPv4 to any LIR. > > > > -- > > Aleksei > > > > LL> Dear Sirs, > > > > LL> I suggest to allow transfer from the last /8 only in 2 years after date of > > LL> allocation from RIPE NCC. I see in the transfer list that this is already > > LL> common practice to transfer /22 from the last /8. > > LL> Any Pros/cons? > > > > LL> -- > > LL> Aleksei Ivanov > > LL> LeaderTelecom > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140812/080d13a5/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014081101013263] Transfer from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2014081101013263] Transfer from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]