[address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation

On 11.04.14 13:37, Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca wrote:

On 11.04.14 11:19, Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca wrote:
> Isnt unequal right now? Are you saying is equal LIRs with thousands 
> and thousands of IP address when there are LIRs with only a /22? Is 
> equal that the LIRs with thousands can make lot of money from LIRs 
> with only a /22?
I think this depends of how you define equality.
Is equality just comparing the number of addresses or IP addresses 
relative to customers or even pr capita of the market the LIR operates in.

>
> Its so hard to prove you need more IPs?
When I was new in this game I had to supply receipts of equipment to 
prove I was building a network. That was hard facts. But a customer 
prognosis based on historical growth or marketing plans was not accepted 
by the community. So I would say - yes its hard - and we have not been 
able to come up with a good criteria yet.

On 11.04.14 13:37, Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca wrote:
> No its not equals. You have mooooooore game with 1 millions address 
> than 1 thousand address. 

If the LIR with 1million IP addresses has 4 million customer it has a 
bigger challenge than the one with 1 thousand addresses if that LIR only 
has 1000 customers.


-- 
Hans Petter Holen
Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph at oslo.net | http://hph.oslo.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140414/78421741/attachment.html>