[address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Fri Apr 11 11:24:51 CEST 2014
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca < datos at tvt-datos.es> wrote: > Good morning all, > Good morning. :) > > > El 10/04/2014 13:30, Gert Doering escribió: > > True. But will it change anything? We knew that we'd run out of IPv4 > at least 10 years ago, and we've made lots of noise to push people towards > IPv6 - and it only started for real when IPv4 had run out. > > > Yes it will. At least I think so. Im not saying to give more space to > everyone. Please consider isnt the same LIRs with thousands and thousands > of IP space and LIRs with only a /22 > Without the possibility, even in the future, of giving more IP space to > little new LIRs you are dooming them. > In terms of IPv4, the little new LIRs have been doomed for a long, long time. This is nothing new. -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140411/d4ec47dd/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]