[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Velea
elvis at velea.eu
Mon Sep 30 15:39:42 CEST 2013
Hi Richard, On 9/27/13 9:25 AM, Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> wrote: > >> However, as I've already pointed out, the new "Sponsored LIR" class of >> End Users introduced by this proposal doesn't really fit the original >> definition. (RFC 7020 uses the terms "child LIRs" / "sub-LIRs" instead.) > > Sponsored/Sponsoring LIR is easy to confuse. > > Child LIR does not easily expand (Grandchild LIR?). > > A Sub-LIR can, if need be, have a Sub-Sub-LIR. > > that sounds like a good idea, I'll talk to the co-authors about this option. cheers, elvis
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]