[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andreas Larsen
andreas.larsen at ip-only.se
Fri Sep 27 19:10:32 CEST 2013
I support the general idea of this proposal. Med vänlig hälsning Andreas Larsen IP-Only Telecommunication AB| Postadress: 753 81 UPPSALA | Besöksadress: S:t Persgatan 6, Uppsala | Telefon: +46 (0)18 843 10 00 | Direkt: +46 (0)18 843 10 56 www.ip-only.se Den 2013-09-27 12:25 skrev Tero Toikkanen <Tero.Toikkanen at nebula.fi>: >Dear all, > >In general I support the direction of this proposal. > >I have already mentioned some of my observations on other ongoing >conversations, but here are a couple more: > >5.2.3 >"results in a doubling of the address space allocated to it" >With larger blocks this seems a bit drastic to me. I.e. if a large >corporation needs a new /32, but already has 4 of them, they will >automagically get 4 /32s more. I assume this is to enable aggregation, >but without making large reservations in the address pool for each End >User, it probably wouldn't work for that purpose. In order to assess how >reasonable this clause is, we would need to know how addresses are >allocated and from where. I my opinion aggregation = good, large >reservations for every single End User with a /32 = bad. > >5.3.1 >"When more than a /48 is to be sub-allocated to the same customer, the >LIR or the End User (via the Sponsoring LIR) must request an approval >from the RIPE NCC." >This is a bit vague wording, which would probably be better by just >removing the parentheses. I assume the idea is that the End User submits >the request to the Sponsoring LIR, which then hands it over to RIPE NCC? > >____________________________________ >Tero Toikkanen >Nebula Oy >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]