This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Fri Sep 27 09:25:50 CEST 2013
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> wrote: > However, as I've already pointed out, the new "Sponsored LIR" class of > End Users introduced by this proposal doesn't really fit the original > definition. (RFC 7020 uses the terms "child LIRs" / "sub-LIRs" instead.) Sponsored/Sponsoring LIR is easy to confuse. Child LIR does not easily expand (Grandchild LIR?). A Sub-LIR can, if need be, have a Sub-Sub-LIR. -- Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]