[address-policy-wg] 2013-03: Good enough?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03: Good enough?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03: Good enough?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Tue Sep 24 12:18:33 CEST 2013
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Jan Ingvoldstad <frettled at gmail.com> wrote: > I think your suggestion for going forward is constructive, and will probably > mitigate the risk you highlighted from the impact analysis. Personally, I feel that point 3) smells a bit like fluff. It's well-known that changes can be proposed and implemented given community support. Stating that in the notes on the process of such a change seems superfluous. Along similar lines, ensuring overall fairness is an oft-stated, and obvious, goal. Pointing it out again in the spirit of consensus can't hurt, either. > I don't know what the proper procedure would be for handling this, but > you've got my support. Ideally, Malcolm or you would start a new PDP to implement the changes you want to see. -- Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03: Good enough?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03: Good enough?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]