[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] black market transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Mon Sep 23 23:43:42 CEST 2013
On 23/09/2013 19:48, Tore Anderson wrote: > We have a 24-month cooling-off period in our transfer policy where a > recently received allocation may not be transferred further. I am not > sure that I would agree that this is a «short or medium term» (as it > says in the linked-to specification) investment horizon, when we're > talking about IPv4. I believe this cooling-off period in itself works as > a deterrence against some that would otherwise be interested in engaging > in speculation, at least the short-term kind. I'm not sure why you think this will act as a deterrent to resource transfers, given that we all generally agree that increasing bureaucratic load will generally only serve to push transfer agreements underground. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] black market transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]