[address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Mon Oct 21 14:14:28 CEST 2013
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:05:14PM +0200, Roger Jørgensen wrote: >> Think I'll just "hijack" this discussion ;p >> >> I fully support the idea of uniting PI and PA into one policy, it's >> just numbers anyway. > > Uh, you're confusing two issues. *This* thread was about being able > to turn IPv*4* PI into PA, while keeping the distinction. > > Andrea Cima presented at the RIPE meeting, and I expect to see a summary > and "next steps" from him soon - especially for the bits that are missing > policywise, and Erik Bais volunteered to work with us to fix those. oh, see that now, sorry. >> However, the presentation on the topic from the three (just two >> onsite) volunteers was very interesting, the consequences and how much >> it affected was amazing. How did we dig us into such a mess? > > *That* is actually about IPv6 land (PA/PI unification, only having a > single "type of addresses" anymore), and I'll open a separate thread on > that "soonish". 'ki, we're waiting:-) -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]