[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)

So I spent my time in the air en route to Athens today reading through
2013-06 again, and have some more comments - one significant, the rest
editorial. Significant first.

Section 5.3.1: says «When more than a /48 is to be sub-allocated to the
same customer, the LIR or the End User (via the Sponsoring LIR) must
request an approval from the RIPE NCC.»

Before, NCC approval was only mandatory for assignments shorter than a
/48 per *End Site*. So if I'm reading the proposed policy correct, a
customer that has >1 sites would need NCC approval if he wanted a /48
for each of them. I don't think we should do that.


Editorial improvements (please keep in mind though that I'm not a native
English speaker so my «gut feeling» about these may well be completely
wrong and should be ignored):

Section 5.6.2: «These assignments have been transformed automatically by
the RIPE NCC in IPv6 allocations.»

- "transformed" -> "converted"
- "in" -> "to"

Section 5.6.2: «End Users holding an allocation lower than a /32»

- "an allocation" -> "allocations"
- "lower" -> "smaller"

Tore