[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 11:54:31AM +0200, Elvis Velea wrote:
> I also think that the discussion about billing related to this policy 
> proposal to take place in the members-discuss, the only place where 
> suggestions can be made and discussed by the ones that will vote.

I actually disagree - it's an inseparable part of the proposal to work
out how the effects on membership and charging scheme can look like,
and what to propose.

When the address policy community agrees on a) the proposal, and b) how
a new charging scheme that takes this into account, we pass the ball to
members-discuss / the AGM to take our input and decide on the final
charging scheme - but without solid agreement from here, the end result
will be "disconnection".

So the discussion needs to stay here, until this community is in
agreement.

(Of course we give a HEADS UP to the members and the NCC board - for 
example by giving a short summary in the NCC services working group,
at the RIPE meeting...)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20131001/8b337065/attachment.sig>